Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Allahabad High Court Case Commentaries

“No-Injury” Attempts to Murder & The Narrow Lane of Section 482 CrPC – A Commentary on Harendra Bansal v. State of U.P. (2025 AHC 144718)

“No-Injury” Attempts to Murder & The Narrow Lane of Section 482 CrPC – A Commentary on Harendra Bansal v. State of U.P. (2025 AHC 144718)

Date: Aug 28, 2025
“No-Injury” Attempts to Murder & The Narrow Lane of Section 482 CrPC Commentary on Harendra Bansal & Anr. v. State of U.P. and Another (2025 AHC 144718) 1. Introduction The Allahabad High Court’s...
State GST Officers May Exercise Section 129 Powers in Inter-State Transactions Without Separate Notification – Comment on Shree Maa Trading Company v. State of U.P. (2025)

State GST Officers May Exercise Section 129 Powers in Inter-State Transactions Without Separate Notification – Comment on Shree Maa Trading Company v. State of U.P. (2025)

Date: Aug 28, 2025
State GST Officers May Exercise Section 129 Powers in Inter-State Transactions Without Separate Notification – Comment on Shree Maa Trading Company & Ors. v. State of U.P. & Ors. (2025 AHC 143407) 1....
Structured, Time‑Bound Trial Management and Police Accountability under Section 309 CrPC upon Bail Denial in POCSO Cases: Commentary on Muneer v. State of U.P. (2025 AHC 142664)

Structured, Time‑Bound Trial Management and Police Accountability under Section 309 CrPC upon Bail Denial in POCSO Cases: Commentary on Muneer v. State of U.P. (2025 AHC 142664)

Date: Aug 21, 2025
Structured, Time‑Bound Trial Management and Police Accountability under Section 309 CrPC upon Bail Denial in POCSO Cases Case: Muneer v. State of U.P. and 3 Others, Criminal Misc. Bail Application...
Stay of Conviction for Legislators: Allahabad High Court mandates prima facie merits review and “irreversible consequence” balancing under BNSS s.430 when RPA s.8 disqualification follows

Stay of Conviction for Legislators: Allahabad High Court mandates prima facie merits review and “irreversible consequence” balancing under BNSS s.430 when RPA s.8 disqualification follows

Date: Aug 21, 2025
Stay of Conviction for Legislators: Allahabad High Court mandates prima facie merits review and “irreversible consequence” balancing under BNSS s.430 when RPA s.8 disqualification follows...
Mere Presence and Generic Exhortation Are Insufficient for Section 302/34 IPC: Allahabad High Court’s Rigorous Threshold for Common Intention in Vijai @ Babban v. State of U.P.

Mere Presence and Generic Exhortation Are Insufficient for Section 302/34 IPC: Allahabad High Court’s Rigorous Threshold for Common Intention in Vijai @ Babban v. State of U.P.

Date: Aug 9, 2025
Mere Presence and Generic Exhortation Are Insufficient for Section 302/34 IPC: Allahabad High Court’s Rigorous Threshold for Common Intention Case: Vijai @ Babban v. State of U.P., 2025:AHC:134249-DB...
Stay of Matrimonial Proceedings Does Not Suspend Section 24 HMA Maintenance; Transfer and Ancillary Proceedings Are “Proceedings under the Act” — Allahabad High Court in Ankit Suman v. State of U.P. (2025:AHC:133601)

Stay of Matrimonial Proceedings Does Not Suspend Section 24 HMA Maintenance; Transfer and Ancillary Proceedings Are “Proceedings under the Act” — Allahabad High Court in Ankit Suman v. State of U.P. (2025:AHC:133601)

Date: Aug 8, 2025
Stay of Matrimonial Proceedings Does Not Suspend Section 24 HMA Maintenance; Transfer and Ancillary Proceedings Are “Proceedings under the Act” Case: Ankit Suman v. State of U.P. and Another |...
UDID Prevails Over Re-Quantification: Functional Competency Boards Cannot Dilute PwBD Reservation in MBBS Admissions — Commentary on Maaz Ahmad v. Union of India (Allahabad High Court, 07 Aug 2025)

UDID Prevails Over Re-Quantification: Functional Competency Boards Cannot Dilute PwBD Reservation in MBBS Admissions — Commentary on Maaz Ahmad v. Union of India (Allahabad High Court, 07 Aug 2025)

Date: Aug 8, 2025
UDID Prevails Over Re-Quantification: Functional Competency Boards Cannot Dilute PwBD Reservation in MBBS Admissions Case: Maaz Ahmad v. U.O.I. Thru. Secy. Ministry Of Health And Family Welfare,...
Primacy of Expert Psychological Evaluation in Section 15 Preliminary Assessments – Commentary on Juvenile X v. State of U.P. (2025)

Primacy of Expert Psychological Evaluation in Section 15 Preliminary Assessments – Commentary on Juvenile X v. State of U.P. (2025)

Date: Jul 31, 2025
Primacy of Expert Psychological Evaluation in Section 15 Preliminary Assessments – Allahabad High Court’s Landmark Ruling in Juvenile X v. State of U.P. and Others (2025 AHC 121427) 1. Introduction...
Medical-Board Reports Are Not Conclusive: Magistrate’s Power to Proceed in Alleged Criminal Negligence Cases – Commentary on Dr. Ashok Kumar Rai v. State of U.P. (2025)

Medical-Board Reports Are Not Conclusive: Magistrate’s Power to Proceed in Alleged Criminal Negligence Cases – Commentary on Dr. Ashok Kumar Rai v. State of U.P. (2025)

Date: Jul 31, 2025
Medical-Board Reports Are Not Conclusive: Magistrate’s Power to Proceed in Alleged Criminal Negligence Cases – Commentary on Dr. Ashok Kumar Rai v. State of U.P. & Anr. (2025 AHC 121211) 1....
Teachers of U.P. Basic Institutions are NOT “Employees” under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 – Commentary on Bindra Prasad Patel v. State of U.P. & Ors.

Teachers of U.P. Basic Institutions are NOT “Employees” under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 – Commentary on Bindra Prasad Patel v. State of U.P. & Ors.

Date: Jul 9, 2025
Teachers of U.P. Basic Institutions are NOT “Employees” under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 Commentary on Bindra Prasad Patel v. State of Uttar Pradesh & 3 Ors. (2025 AHC 106762) 1. Introduction...
“Nocturnal Summons & Women’s Liberty” – Allahabad High Court’s Fresh Mandate on Transit-Anticipatory Bail and Police Notices

“Nocturnal Summons & Women’s Liberty” – Allahabad High Court’s Fresh Mandate on Transit-Anticipatory Bail and Police Notices

Date: Jun 13, 2025
“Nocturnal Summons & Women’s Liberty” – Allahabad High Court’s Fresh Mandate on Transit-Anticipatory Bail and Police Notices Introduction In Sushila Yadav v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. (Home) &...
Non-Justiciability of High Court Judge Transfers and Oath Administration under Articles 124(4), 217(1)(b) & 222 of the Constitution

Non-Justiciability of High Court Judge Transfers and Oath Administration under Articles 124(4), 217(1)(b) & 222 of the Constitution

Date: Apr 24, 2025
Non-Justiciability of High Court Judge Transfers and Oath Administration under Articles 124(4), 217(1)(b) & 222 of the Constitution Introduction This commentary examines the Allahabad High Court’s...
Legitimacy of Territorial Restrictions in Biomass E‑Tenders for Environmental Objectives

Legitimacy of Territorial Restrictions in Biomass E‑Tenders for Environmental Objectives

Date: Apr 22, 2025
Legitimacy of Territorial Restrictions in Biomass E‑Tenders for Environmental Objectives 1. Introduction This commentary examines the April 18, 2025 Division Bench judgment of the Allahabad High...
Striking a Balance Between Compassionate Appointments and Children’s Right to Quality Education

Striking a Balance Between Compassionate Appointments and Children’s Right to Quality Education

Date: Apr 17, 2025
Striking a Balance Between Compassionate Appointments and Children’s Right to Quality Education Introduction In Shailendra Kumar v. The State of U.P. and Others (2025: AHC 57129), the Allahabad High...
Mandated Communication of Arrest Grounds: Strengthening Constitutional Safeguards under Article 22

Mandated Communication of Arrest Grounds: Strengthening Constitutional Safeguards under Article 22

Date: Apr 16, 2025
Mandated Communication of Arrest Grounds: Strengthening Constitutional Safeguards under Article 22 Introduction The judgment in Manjeet Singh @ Inder @ Manjeet Singh Chana v. State Of U.P. And 2...
Reaffirming Judicial Restraint: Limits on Transferring Investigations in Ongoing Trials

Reaffirming Judicial Restraint: Limits on Transferring Investigations in Ongoing Trials

Date: Apr 14, 2025
Reaffirming Judicial Restraint: Limits on Transferring Investigations in Ongoing Trials Introduction The judgment in Usman Ali v. State Of U.P. And 12 Others delivered by the Allahabad High Court on...
Affirmation of the Burden-Shift Principle under Section 106 of the Evidence Act in Honour Killing Cases

Affirmation of the Burden-Shift Principle under Section 106 of the Evidence Act in Honour Killing Cases

Date: Apr 11, 2025
Affirmation of the Burden-Shift Principle under Section 106 of the Evidence Act in Honour Killing Cases Introduction The judgment in Ibrahim v. State of U.P. (Allahabad High Court, 7.4.2025), marks a...
Establishing the Precedent on Relying on Prior Orders in Administrative Litigation

Establishing the Precedent on Relying on Prior Orders in Administrative Litigation

Date: Apr 11, 2025
Establishing the Precedent on Relying on Prior Orders in Administrative Litigation Introduction The case of Anurag Sharma And 5 Others v. State Of U.P. And 2 Others was presided over by the Allahabad...
The Mandate of Self-Reliance: A New Precedent on Non-Interference in Marital Peace

The Mandate of Self-Reliance: A New Precedent on Non-Interference in Marital Peace

Date: Apr 5, 2025
The Mandate of Self-Reliance: A New Precedent on Non-Interference in Marital Peace Introduction In the case of Smt. Shreya Kesarwani And Another v. State Of U.P. And 3 Others, the Allahabad High...
Establishing Rigorous Standards for Bail in Cases of Conspiracy and Public Order Disturbance

Establishing Rigorous Standards for Bail in Cases of Conspiracy and Public Order Disturbance

Date: Apr 4, 2025
Establishing Rigorous Standards for Bail in Cases of Conspiracy and Public Order Disturbance Introduction The judgment in Pradeep Kumar @ Pradeep Poonia (As Per F.I.R.) v. State Of U.P. Thru. Prin....
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert